Beetles of subtropical north-east New South Wales

& south-east Queensland.

With Notes on their Conservation Status.

Text and any photos Ó Allen Sundholm, 1998.

Return to MAIN HOME PAGE

Email: entom@eagles.bbs.net.au

 

References:

McKEOWN, K. C., 1947: "Catalogue of the Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) of Australia", Memoir X, the Australian Museum.


 

ORDER COLEOPTERA

Family BUPRESTIDAE

Subfamily Stigmoderinae

Tribe Stigmoderini

 

Genus Calodema

Calodema regalis LaPorte & Gory, 1838

Comments: A large and spectacularly colourful jewel beetle. Its streamlined spinose elytra are a rich yellow, while the pronotum is metallic emerald green adorned marginally with two blood-red patches. Ventrally it is metallic emerald green with splashes of pale yellow. The adults feed on the nectar of Angophora spp., Backhousea and even the introduced declared noxious weed Privet Bush, in or within sight of rainforest or rainforest-lined watercourses. It occurs in Papua New Guinea, northern Queensland, and from south-east Queensland to at least as far south as the Taree region of New South Wales. In December 1987, adults of what appeared to be this species were observed in the Ourimbah/Narrara area. They were attending high flowers in the rainforest. On a separate occassion another person saw a specimen that had settled on a yellow clothes peg, but which quickly flew off. Both sightings were in or near the unique area of remnant rainforest which occurs in the Ourimbah/Narrara area, about one and a half hour’s drive north of Sydney. If the occurrance of this species is confirmed in this area, it will represent the southernmost distribution record for the species and add considerably to the significance of this area of remnant rainforest.

The adults fly throughout the day but are reputedly most active in the morning from about 9.00 am to 11.00 am. They are highly seasonal, occuring locally in numbers in some seasons while in most seasons they are scarce or absent. In northern New South Wales they reportedly emerge more reliably than in the south of their range. The larval host has not been recorded. Not shown to be endangered.

 

Family CERAMBYCIDAE

Subfamily Lamiinae

Genus Batocera Castelneau, 1840

Subgenus Tyrannolamia Kreis

Batocera boisduvali Hope, 1839

Comments: This is the most southerly species in the genus Batocera, I believe is endemic to the region, and is one of the most beautiful Batocera. The recorded larval host plants are Ficus macrophylla (Morton Bay Fig) and Ficus australis. Label data in the Australian Museum and from personal experience indicates the emergence period is mid-summer to early autumn. Adults have been seen in numbers on a large fallen Ficus sp. branch in rainforest at Mt Glorious in south-eastern Queensland, and are also attracted to light. Not shown to be endangered.

The species ranges along the eastern coast and ranges from Mt Glorious near Brisbane in south-east Queensland to the Taree district in New South Wales. Adults have been collected from late December to early March, in rainforest areas but also possibly wherever its Ficus larval host plant occurs e.g. suburban plantings.

Taxonomic Comments: The latest taxonomic revision affecting this species was by K. McKweon in 1947, who recognised three varietal forms. However, the status of these is in need of revision, as the form, Batocera boisduvali (Hope) var. frenchi Poll. which has distinct round spots on the elytra, and which McKeown stated as occurring in NSW, appears to be confined to northern Queensland. Specimens of Batocera boisduvali from south-east Queensland and New South Wales have markings which are quite irregular and lie against a paler light grey suffused background colour (see illustration by clicking here), but there also exist specimens that are either intermediate or variations of one form or another.

Illustration: See a photo of a live female, found by a friend and I in north-eastern NSW, then click on the hyperlink to return here.

 

Tribe Clytini

Genus Chlorophorus

Chlorophorus curtisi

Comments: Occurs very commonly from the far south-east of Queensland and slightly less commonly in north-east New South Wales. I have recently found that this species occurs as far south as Kempsey, New South Wales (November 1997), where it was found on the flowers of Leptospermum polygalifolium Johnson. In northern NSW and in Qld it is more usually found on the freshest flowers of Angophora spp. and Eucalyptus spp.

 

Family CETONIINAE

Subfamily

Genus Trichlaurax

 

Trichlaurax phillipsi 

Comments: Though not the largest it is undoubtedly one of the most beautiful Cetoniines in the world, as well as one of the most unsual, as its elytra are lined with deep furrows full of long hairs. It occurs from north Queensland to Victoria and South Australia. Specimens from the south of its range are small and invariably the hairs are white. Specimens from the Hunter Valley (north-west of Sydney) are of medium size and nearly always with white hairs, while the hair on those from northern New South Wales often show some of the orange-brown tint that specimens from north-east Queensland have, which hairs are entirely orange-brown. The name macleayi for the north-east Queensland form should perhaps be reduced to a variety or mere clinal form only, as it cannot meet the geographic isolation requirement to qualify as a valid subspecies.

Adults occur seasonally, and when emerged occur only on the freshest flowers, usually at height, typically Angophora spp. They will also be found on Eucalyptus and Leptospermum flowers, and doubtless many other host plant flowers. They will often fly rapidly and evasively back and forth and to and fro for a long time around a tall flowering tree before finally settling onto a flowerhead to feed. If disturbed they will instantly fall and buzz off at speed. Not shown to be endangered.

 

(This document is still incomplete, last updated 14th May 1998)


Return to MAIN LINK PAGE

Email: entom@eagles.bbs.net.au


Notes on definitions used:

Conservation Status: Status is determined by an assessment based on personal observation, and is readily visually confirmable by visiting the regions and seeing the taxa yourself. Take a video camera and record some of them live. I have. Whilst I fully support the protection of natural and regenerating habitats, I can only support the protection of an individual taxon where it is able to be shown to be endangered on a scientific basis. Very few taxa meet this criteria. I also perfectly realise that the assessments stated here in these web pages are hardly scientific, being entirely subjective, but they represent opinions which if I had sufficient resources (time, money, energy) I could develop and send to a scientific publisher a draft for peer review and hopefully publication. Unfortunately I don't have such resources to spare, but anyone is free to make their own assessments in a scientific publication of competent jurisdiction. You don't need a degree to engage in science, but most employees will want that bit of paper to justify employing you, even if you subsequently do lousy science! The point is, don't simply swallow so-called "scientific studies" or other claims by "qualified" persons or otherwise, stating that a certain species is endangered. The data data must be transparent (can be inspected yourself), has not been manipulated to support the author's or proponent's point of view, is repeatable, and cannot be readily contradicted by even a casual observation or unedited single-scene video recording.

Though I am no lawyer, the possibility of fraud may well arise in instances where a claim that a species is "endangered" (a subjective term anyway) is knowingly falsely made. Also, sheer ignorance and media hype can drum up false illusions as to a species true population status. Some statements made in the Australian media in recent years have claimed or assumed that Ornithoptera richmondius (Gray), 1853 is endangered, some to the point of hysteria. I would submit that this claim or assumption is a patently wrong, as visitors to the region's rainforests at the right time during suitable weather conditions could repeatably support and show to others using video recordings. Though such observations hardly constitutes scientifically acceptable data, this species is readily observable nevertheless, and I would invite scientific researchers to undertake and publish truly competent assessments of this species at suitable times of the year, and do this each year for say 10 or 15 years or so to establish some idea of population variations over time.

Sometimes size and colour is all you need to convince the public and governments that something is endangered, e.g. the situation with most butterflies listed on CITES is that most, if not all, have never been repeatedly scientifically shown to be endangered. In fact, I submit, based on my own observations in the wild and of personal communications from others (which I could, if I had the resources, confirm or deny myself , so I suggest you to go see them in the wild too), most CITES species are in fact normally quite common where their habitats are themselves not endangered e.g. by clearing or clear-fell logging. For example, I have seen for myself how common in their natural habitats some CITES species really are. In eastern and northern Australia, in Peninsular Malaysia, in northern Borneo, and in The Philippines, Ornithoptera priamus euphorion Gray, Ornithoptera richmondius (Gray), Triodes rhadamantus Lucas, Triodes andromache andromache Staudinger, Triodes plateni Staudinger, Trogonoptera brookiana albescens Rothschild ar